Tuesday, 21 March 2017

Am I a religious sectarian, or worse, a fanatic? A brief checklist


In many parts of the world, religion is an important part of the identify of a human being. There are clashes and riots based on religious choices, places of worship and rituals. In this era of violence using religion as an excuse, this is a simple checklist for self-Diagnosis on whether one is a religious sectarian or worse, a full-blown bigot.  Read these statements and introspect. All statements start with ‘I’ because as I mentioned before, it is meant for self-diagnosis. The answers should be YES or NO.

  •   I believe followers of my religion will find heaven/attain salvation/attain spiritual superiority whereas followers of other religions will all either go to hell/not find salvation/continue to be steeped in ignorance.
  •    I believe that the rituals or rites in my religion have a deep philosophical and religious/scientific meaning whereas most of the rites found in other religions are superstitions/blind beliefs.
  •   Whenever there is a sex scandal involving a religious priest/maulvi/imam/guru/swami of my religion, I am convinced that it is the work of his enemies or the enemies of my religion, whereas if the news is about religious priest/guru/maulvi/swami of another religion, I happily believe the news to be 100 % true.
  •      When someone who follows my religion uses violence against others, I think he/she is ‘defending’ my religion from others, but if people of other religion adopt similar violence, I call them terrorists/fundamentalists/ militants/radicals.
  •    I think my religion has deeper philosophy/more holiness/more purity than other religions. 
  •     I read the books of other religions so that I can find verses which look silly/illogical and thus reinforce my opinion that my religious book is the best and has all the solutions. I never read the religious books of other religions in full, understanding the context and full meaning of what is said.
  •     When I meet a new person I wait to hear which religion he follows and based on his/her choice immediately form an opinion about that person based on what I think about that religion.
  •    I always fear that members of my religion are being persecuted. I sometimes believe that the world is conspiring against my religion and that the population of those who follow my religion is decreasing. I always remember areas of the world where the population of my religion followers is going down, but rarely remember those areas where their population is going up.
  •    When I hear a person has embraced the same religion as I follow, I feel elated, but if a person leaves my religion and joins another religion I consider him lost his way/shameless/greedy or converted due to force.
  •    I definitely get/would get very angry when/if a member of my family marries someone outside my religion, especially if it is my daughter or another female relative such as niece.         


If I have answered YES to all the above questions, undoubtedly, I must be a religious fanatic. If none of this is true, I think one is on the way to break free from the chains of religious bigotry.  Once again, please note this is for self-diagnosis and should not be used to judge whether others are sectarian or no. Readers of this short blog are free to add their own checklist points.

©Staju Jacob, 2017.


Staju Jacob is the author of the path-breaking book Karmasutra The Karma of Sex, which deals with the karmic spirituality of consensual sexual actions. This book is available globally on various Amazon sites in Paperback and Kindle, Sony Kobo, Google books, Iphone Ibook etc.  He may be contacted on Twitter @KaRmasutraTKOS 

Thursday, 23 February 2017

Why democracy is NOT the best form of government? The problem of IOP


After the election of Donald Trump I had penned a blog post on the 'Age of Mahabali'. (http://karmasutratkos.blogspot.co.uk/2016/11/trump-harbinger-of-age-of-mahabali.html). After reading that blog, one of my friends remarked that despite being the best system of governance, democracy is pushing people like Donald Trump to the top when there are possibly thousands of far better quality people in the US.  I remained silent.

However, I have always believed that democracy as it exists in countries like US or UK (and in other countries which have simply copied that system) is NOT the best system of governance. This Western style democracy is merely a system of governance which could be perhaps considered the least pernicious. Needless to say, there is always a fine line of difference between the least of evils and the genuinely best.

If Western (UK/US style) democracy was indeed the best system of governance it should have automatically catapulted the most competent, visionary, ethical leaders to the top leadership positions. But as we have seen recently in the case of US elections, which is one of the best examples of democracy, where voting is by and large free from fear of violence, coercion or bribery - it is possible for unpleasant, toxic people to reach the top position.  In Germany, in 1932 also, Hitler's Nazi party got the largest number of votes (effectively, 'won the elections') through a largely free and fair democratic system.  And we are not even going to 'democracies' such as those in Africa, parts of Latin America, Asia etc. where voting and elections are unduly influenced by money, brute power, intimidation and violence.

What then, is the problem with this model of democracy? Isn’t it better to get a leader by majority votes? Isn’t it far better not to have a king or a dictator who will govern a country ruthlessly and more often than not, amass wealth, concentrate power, punish people – all for personal pride, ego and aggrandisement?  All these arguments are fair. But in order to better illustrate the problem of democracy, let me narrate an imaginary story.

Let us imagine that a small chartered jet plane having 70 passengers and having only a pilot, co-pilot and stewardess, is flying from New York to London. By an unfortunate quirk of fate, while the jet is high above the Atlantic Ocean, the main pilot suffers a fatal heart attack and is dead within minutes on his seat. Now, the inexperienced co-pilot takes over, but as luck would have it, all this stress causes him to suddenly feel faint and within minutes, he is also lying unconscious. The plane seems to be flying smoothly as of now, but the panicked stewardess who was informed by the co-pilot before his collapse, thinks it fit to apprise the passengers of the grave situation, after her own efforts to revive either of the two pilots fail. There is no doctor or medical professional on board this plane.

Among the passengers there is a man about 67 years of age, who volunteers to take over the controls in the cockpit. Another brilliant, physically attractive, very fit young man who is a top investment banker also offers his service. This young man of 33 has been a top scorer in mathematics and in his class of Wharton, had scored the highest marks in almost every subject.

Both of them volunteer to take over the controls of the plane using emergency instruction manuals and whatever other resources are at hand to help the plane land somewhere smoothly.  Since there are two contenders, and both seem convinced that they are the best suited to save the plane and the passengers, the stewardess asks the remaining 68 passengers to vote by a show of hands for the person they would like to take charge of the plane.

The investment banker talks of his brilliant intelligence, grasping powers, mathematical prowess etc. for one minute and asks the passengers to vote for him to take over the cockpit. However, he admits he has never flown a plane before.

In his brief self-introduction, the 65 year old man with a minor problem of slight back pain but otherwise fit, says that while his main occupation before retirement was a manager of an insurance company, his hobby was to fly planes by being a member of a flying club. He has over 500 hours of flying experience of different planes.

Whom would the panic-stricken, stressed passengers in this emergency situation vote for? It is a no-brainer. The moment they hear the short speech of the 65 year old man they instantly breathe a collective sigh of relief and unanimously agree that the man with flying expertise and experience must take over the controls, perhaps assisted by the other young man.

This is how good mature democracies are supposed to work, where people think and act intelligently to preserve their own best interests by electing the best suited leader to take them further on the journey of growth, progress and betterment.

Now let us tweak the situation a little. Let us assume that other than the 65 year old man, the stewardess and the two pilots (who are now out of the picture), every other passenger and staff on the plane has the intelligence of a 3- year old normal child.  (Let us ignore for a moment the technicalities of the situation – for example, how these adults are being allowed to travel without escorts etc.)

In this situation, perhaps there is a real danger that these unruly passengers may not listen to the 65 year old man who alone who has the expertise to land the plane safely. They might fight among themselves. Or they might elect someone who has the best muscles, assuming perhaps like 3 year-olds, that physical strength is the most important quality to steer a plane. Or they might vote for the most sweet-looking bloke or lady. There is also a chance they might vote to install in the cockpit, those who are similar to themselves in some way – for example,  those who look similar to them (Black or White or Asian) or speak the same language.

The reason why these mentally challenged passengers are not able to see clearly through the situation is because their limited mental resources do not allow them to think straight through all the diverse information (noise and chatter) thrown at them about race, religion, beauty and so on. Their logical thinking processes are not sufficiently developed for them to think clearly without getting swayed by emotions and various other variables/factors which are not relevant to their situation.

This can often happen in a democracy. When the collective intelligence and moral compass of a society is disturbed by confusing information, emotion, sense of grievance etc. and people in a society do not have sufficient foresight and mental clarity to sift through this maze of information to focus on what is clearly relevant for them; then we see that people end up voting in a haphazard, impulsive manner. 

Normal human beings of 16 years and above do not have the intelligence of 3 year olds. We are rational beings – some of the readers might argue.

Are we really rational? How many us actually go to a supermarket and pick things on impulse because we like the colour of packaging or its attractive presentation? Do we really compare all the products of similar types available in the market place and then buy the best priced and highest quality product which is what rationally we should have done? Do we not have the irrational history of consuming products like Cola soft drinks  which most of us know is far more damaging to our health than plain water or fresh orange juice, simply because they give us fleeting almost emotional satisfaction on our taste buds?

History has proven again and again that societies which tend to get swayed by emotions, past grievances, perceived grievances, stress and incomplete or distorted information etc. tend to elect people who would otherwise never be elected. Because many Germans carried the perception of grievance and unfairness after the 1st world war, they thought it fit to support someone like Hitler who showed the macho promise of teaching all those who wronged the Germans, a lesson.

Hence, the question is not whether the intelligence of a society is of a 3- year old or 15 year old. The more important question is whether the society is bombarded by too much information -  real, fake, perceptions, opinions, bigotry etc. to the extent that the population within that society becomes as confused as a 3- year old with a variety of choices.  A 3-year old may not have the intelligence or logical discrimination to choose which amongst a bar of chocolate, a slice of apple pie or a £50 note, is the best option.  A 3-year old might get logically disoriented when 5 or 6 different complicated variables are thrown at him and asked to sift information that is relevant from the irrelevant pieces of information.  In such a scenario, when pressed to make a decision, the child might decide on impulse or emotion rather than clear logic. For an adult human the same disorientation might set in, when 25 or 30 different variables, strains of thoughts and ideas are bombarded unto his conscious screen.  

Imagine an adult of average intelligence already having his/her own subtle bias/prejudices, and now bombarded with hundreds of messages on social media, informal opinions, Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, Whatsapp shares,  television, conventional newspapers, thousands of websites, hoardings etc. Some of these Facebook posts, Whatsapp forwards and Tweets are informal messages with little or no editorial control,  while other messages come through responsible, quality checked, facts-verified sources. The most simplistic messages are very often constructed on personal opinions with poor review of facts, but easier to consume than complicated messages with nuanced arguments. It might not therefore be surprising if the average adult decides to seek refuge in simplistic messages rather than nuanced and complicated arguments from reliable sources. Some of these messages lead people into an imaginary world of conspiracy theories and an alternative world view. It can all lead to a vote based on impulse, emotion, distorted, parochial, bigoted or prejudiced world view.  To the somewhat objective observer, this might look as ludicrous as the plane load of passengers opting for the good looking 33 year old man with no experience instead of the 65 year old flying expert to save their plane.  But I call it the Information Overload Paradox (IOP).

Therefore, it is no surprise that to this adult with overload of simplistic information, Brexit looked far more attractive option to protect Britain or Trump looked like the person most fit to guard US borders from Islamic terror.


Now that I have outlined the great problem of democratic societies in the era of information overload, (and this is only going to get worse), I will not escape without giving the solution for this problem.  But since this post has already become quite long, I think I will outline my holistic solution for this eternal question of governance, both a short-term fix and also the long-term panacea (which comes from the deep annals of Eastern wisdom), in my next blog post. 

©Staju Jacob, 2017.


Staju Jacob is the author of the path-breaking book Karmasutra The Karma of Sex, which deals with the karmic spirituality of consensual sexual actions. This book is available globally on various Amazon sites in Paperback and Kindle, Sony Kobo, Google books, Iphone Ibook etc.  He may be contacted on Twitter @KaRmasutraTKOS 

Monday, 16 January 2017

The Changing Contours of Gender



In ancient Hinduism, the physical manifestation of gender has always been considered something temporary. In the 1st chapter of the book ‘Karmasutra The Karma of Sex’, I have mentioned the ancient Mahabharata (Hindu-epic) story of Shikhandi, a princess who takes birth subsequently in a male physical form, to achieve her objective of taking revenge from Bheeshma, although mentally she is still a woman. There are other examples too.  Lord Vishnu easily takes the form of beautiful Mohini and steals nectar from the hands of demons. The ancient form where Lord Shiva merges into his consort Parvati and assumes the form of half-woman and half-man Ardhanarishwara, is another beautiful example which depicts the fluidity of gender.


Such examples are difficult to find in the Quran or the Bible. In the West, in the Christian tradition, gender has by and large, always been considered sacrosanct – like time and space. Gender change or people behaving different to their originally ‘designed’ gender has been frowned upon in the Bible. The Biblical verse Deuteronomy 22:5 says quite unambiguously “A woman shall not wear a man's garment, nor shall a man put on a woman's cloak, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord your God.”

In the Old Testament of the Bible, gender roles are clearly stratified. For example, Genesis 2:18 says   “….Lord God said, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him.””   Similarly, in Genesis 3:16  “To the woman he (God) said, “I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children. Your desire shall be contrary to your husband, but he shall rule over you.””

As we progress further into the Bible New Testament, things seem to be slightly better for women, with the promise of equality in salvation. For example, in Galatians 3:28 “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus”.

In the last century, in the West, there has been much improvement in this whole outlook towards the female gender. Starting from women’s suffrage and equality before law, the West has started to accept that gender and the roles based on gender dictated by religious mores are best left to books. Women have increasingly taken up every kind of job previously the sole preserve of men.  For example, today in many parts of the world, there are women in roles such as lorry drivers, taxi drivers, soldiers in frontline combat, fighter plane pilots, heavy crane operators and ladies working as prison wardens inside male prisons.  In most other non-Catholic denominations, women have also acquired many church leadership positions.

For various reasons, Islamic societies have been many steps behind. In countries like Saudi, women still have to be accompanied by men while travelling, or they could be arrested. In order to travel abroad, they need permission from the male head of the family. In many Islamic countries, the women is not considered the equal to man in the eyes of law.  In Pakistan, for example, as per the Hudood ordinance introduced during the Zia regime, a female victim of rape must produce four male witnesses to support her accusation. If she fails to do so, she could be punished for adultery, which again, is a crime in Islam. In other words, the whole onus is on the accused to produce four witnesses, that too males who have witnessed her being raped.  Otherwise the victim could become the convicted criminal. What gross injustice!!

Even in non-Islamic so-called democratic countries such as India, Nepal or Sri Lanka, despite their ancient Eastern influence/traditions, at least in the rural areas and in small towns, the societal norms for women are rather stringent.  For example, there is still a loss of reputation in the society for a family whose daughters travel to and from the house after dark.

On the contrary, in Western developed societies, the acceptance of gender role reversals has gone up by leaps and bounds, to the extent that there is acceptance that men can also take up tasks, meant exclusively for women earlier. This acceptance, backed by law has resulted in far-reaching changes in public attitudes and ideas about gender.  The recent story in Time magazine about a transgender brother of a reputed author breastfeeding the baby created a sensation. There was another similar story in the Guardian. The idea of a man breastfeeding a baby was still shocking to some, while to many, it was a sign of our modern times. If women can do the tasks assigned for men, why can’t men opt for some of the biological tasks reserved for women such as bearing a baby or breast-feeding?



This slow acceptance is not related to acceptance of gender roles. We are also beginning to accept that the physical features that define different genders are also not set in stone. The story of the bearded lady Harnaam Kaur from Slough, UK is a case in point. After struggling with bullying, feelings of inferiority and shame for years, she has slowly transformed into a fashion icon in London. 
This is also perhaps a step forward in gender equality. If men have the choice of retaining the beards or looking clean and well-shaven, why should the same choices not be available to women, especially those who happen to have hair growth?  Some women have also decided to make a statement about their equality by refusing to shave their armpit hair, even when they wear sleeveless clothes.



But if medical sciences kick start their fast-track innovations, in a similar way to what has happened in computing and electronics, perhaps we can really see a world in not-so-far future where gender becomes a fluid and transient identity factor for every human.  Large numbers of people might opt to stay as men for some periods of their lives and then remain women for the remaining part of their lives (or vice-versa). It may also happen that large numbers of people might even choose to keep switching their genders every few years like they might switch their cars, dresses or mobile phones.  When this happens, the whole militant feminism movement may lose some of its steam, simply because if a woman does not like what she is, she can easily switch to become a man. Similarly, if a man does not like it among men, he can opt out of that gender.  Some people might even choose to remain hermaphrodites, since it might give them more flexibility in sexual matters. Most government forms may be forced to remove gender as one factor of identification or may have a query which reads ‘what is your present gender?’ or ‘what gender would you like to declare yourself to be?’


The present thinking of gender as something written in stone must go. The story of Shikhandi’s gender change in Mahabharata across different births will start happening in a single lifetime for many. To all those who seek spiritual guidance in these times of changing paradigms, the ancient Hindu image of Ardhanarishwara should be a guiding futuristic allegory in matters related to gender.


©Staju Jacob, 2017.


Staju Jacob is the author of the path-breaking book Karmasutra The Karma of Sex, which deals with the karmic spirituality of consensual sexual actions. This book is available globally on various Amazon sites in Paperback and Kindle, Sony Kobo, Google books, Iphone Ibook etc.  He may be contacted on Twitter @KaRmasutraTKOS 

Saturday, 7 January 2017

Listening to the Universe

Some years ago, I used to teach at a college in North West London as visiting faculty. The classroom was on the third floor of the building, while most of the teaching essentials such as whiteboard markers, laptop, projector cable and so on were kept in the faculty office on the ground floor. Most teachers had to make one or two trips downstairs. Thankfully, there was a lift. I had two classes per week on that floor for one trimester (about three months).

I remember a rather pretty colleague who taught another subject on the same floor, with the same timings as mine. She was lovely, with striking features, long dark hair and beautiful dark eyes (and no, dear readers, this true story is not going anywhere romantic :-)). She was in her late thirties and had put on some weight after childbirth a few years earlier. She had both morning and afternoon classes on that floor, with an hour-long lunch break in between. I often noticed her eating lunch in the classroom itself. On most days, she would be having a thick cabbage soup. She told me she was trying hard to lose weight by cutting down on carbs.

One day, midway through the trimester, the only lift in the building stopped working. As it turned out, it remained out of order for the rest of the term. During this period, my colleague would climb the stairs once in the morning, all the while cursing the college administration for not fixing the lift. Until her classes ended at 5 in the evening, she would only go down a floor if she needed to use the toilet. Otherwise, she would use her charm and a friendly smile to persuade me or other male colleagues heading to the ground floor to fetch things for her, such as markers. Some of the male teachers on that floor even made special trips downstairs just for her—such was her charm. In her own way, she was quite pleased that she could get things done using her pleasant manner.

At the time, the irony of it didn't strike me, but it did later. Here was a woman working hard to reduce her calorie intake through salads and cabbage soup, yet when the universe sent her opportunities for physical activity—like climbing stairs—she refused to embrace them.

The universe (or God, or Guardian Angel, or Allah, or Ishwar, depending on one’s preferred term) is always trying to do some good for us, but we often fail to see it. In countless small ways, the universe sends us messages about what we need holistically, in alignment with our destiny, but we often refuse to recognise them. As I mention in my book Karmasutra, developing a thinner CSB (cosmic sensitivity barrier) is immensely helpful in recognising and appreciating these gifts. If our minds are too cluttered with the noise of the external world, we lose the subtle skills required for introspection.

A bloated ego also leaves little room for introspection. The introspection matrix I shared in my November 2016 blog post (http://karmasutratkos.blogspot.co.uk/2016/11/an-introspection-framework.html) might be useful here. Similarly, methods to reduce ego may also help (refer to http://karmasutratkos.blogspot.co.uk/2016/12/beating-down-ego-some-feasible-tried.html).

Perhaps I can share more simple examples of how the universe tries to guide us. Sometimes, at a big function or event, we arrive to find that many of the dishes are already finished. This, too, may be the universe trying to tell us we do not need those extra calories—or that it is protecting us from that food altogether.



A friend of mine in Goa once told me, in the presence of his wife, that he used to get annoyed with her when he returned from work and found less rice on his dinner plate. His wife replied that she always served the same quantity, but on some days he was simply ravenous. He wondered why she couldn’t just cook a little extra rice every day. She responded that she didn’t like wasting food on days when he had little appetite.

Later, he told me his wife had started cooking extra rice daily so that he could eat to his heart’s content. At the time, I sympathised with him, having had similar conversations with my mother about food.

A few weeks ago, I spoke to this friend again, and he told me he had been diagnosed with high cholesterol and borderline diabetes. He attributed it to work-related stress. It occurred to me that years ago, the universe may have been sending him a message through his wife to eat less at night but he simply refused to listen.

Another friend from North India enjoys driving fast. One summer, his car engine overheated and broke down during a long journey. Perhaps the universe was trying to tell him to slow down.

The universe sends us many such messages. Sometimes the bus that takes us from the train station to the office (a 15-minute walk) is cancelled. This might be the universe reminding us we need the exercise.

Some of us watch late-night films after work, then wake early the next day and feel exhausted. This is the universe warning us that our sleep needs are not being met. Instead of dismissing the message with a double espresso and flooding our system with caffeine, we might do better by meditating or napping during the commute. A mobile phone alarm can wake us just before our 20-minute journey ends.

The universe also speaks to us through our bodies. Assuming no chronic digestive disorder, frequent high acidity is a sign we are overeating or consuming too much sugar. We don’t need to be spiritually advanced to read these basic signals.

Here are some simple ways the universe communicates:

  • We are having lunch at the office when someone unexpectedly drops by. This could be the universe’s way of telling us to stop eating or to share our food, thereby preventing excess calorie intake.

  • A phone call during a meal might be a cue to pause or slow our eating.

  • During an intense meeting to negotiate a tricky contract, an interruption—a phone call or visitor might be a signal that we need to pause and rethink. We could be missing something. Taking a break and continuing later may help.

  • In the midst of a heated argument at home with a spouse, relative or close friend, a phone or doorbell interruption should not be ignored. It may be a sign we are about to cross a red line in the argument. We can use that moment to cool down. Ignoring the interruption and continuing the argument might lead us to say or do something we later regret.

The universe also speaks to us in more complex aspects of life. Sometimes we invest deeply in a romantic relationship that brings constant stress and sleepless nights. We convince ourselves that all relationships must be like this. But perhaps the stress is the universe telling us that this is not the right relationship. When we are with the person meant for us, we feel happier overall, even if we argue occasionally. Human beings were not created to endure continuous emotional stress over a partner. That’s not a natural way to live. If the stress is constant, it is a sign to reconsider. Sometimes we fail to think creatively and explore the options before us.

The same applies to our work lives. We are always more productive when we are happy and not overly stressed. If our job causes constant stress, perhaps it’s time to look for a new workplace. The universe always presents options.

If we’ve changed jobs three or four times and still experience the same breaking-point pressures, we might be in the wrong career. If we’ve always loved English literature but are working in investment banking due to parental pressure for a 'prestigious' job, we may continue to feel stressed no matter where we work. This is the universe reminding us we are not fulfilling our true calling.

Sometimes we love our profession but feel we’re being treated unfairly in one organisation, so we move to another. There, too, we find office politics and negativity. We change jobs again and the situation worsens. It begins to feel like we’re jumping from frying pan to fire.

In such cases, the problem may not be the profession. The universe may be telling us to be less self-centred. We may be too focussed on our own thoughts and feelings, forgetting the importance of spreading happiness. The remedy is simple: buy a birthday card for someone, offer public appreciation of a colleague’s good work, or spend time with someone we usually avoid and try to build a connection.

The universe also sends deeper messages. Suppose I am a devout Muslim walking peacefully on the High Street, and a volunteer from a Hindu organisation offers me a free copy of the Bhagavad Gita. My first instinct might be to decline and move on. But perhaps the universe is offering me a chance to deepen my spiritual understanding by learning about another path. There is an old saying in India: "When the disciple is ready, the guru will appear."

Discerning what the universe is telling us is not always easy. Our logical and reactive instincts may pull us in another direction. But if we learn to listen, things begin to fall into place. Harmony increases, and people may even begin to call us ‘lucky’.

Let me close with a story I once read. There was a great spiritual master who taught that God exists in all things—animals, humans and even inanimate objects. Among his many disciples was one who was very devoted but somewhat lacking in intelligence.

One day, this disciple stood at the base of a steep hill. At the top, a monkey was struggling to climb while pushing a large boulder. The boulder began to shift. A passer-by nearby saw what was happening and shouted repeatedly, “Move away, the boulder might roll down!” But the disciple ignored him, believing that since God was in everything—the monkey and the rock, no harm would come.

Suddenly, the boulder rolled down. The disciple tried to move but was too late and was badly injured.

When the master heard what had happened and came to visit him, the disciple was inconsolable. “Master, you always taught that God is in everything. I’ve always been so devoted. How could the monkey and the rock harm me?”

The master smiled and replied gently, “My son, you forgot that God was also in the stranger who was warning you to move away.”


Namaste, Cheers and Happy New Year 2017. Stay blessed. 

©Staju Jacob, 2017.


Staju Jacob is the author of the path-breaking book Karmasutra The Karma of Sex, which deals with the karmic spirituality of consensual sexual actions. This book is available globally on various Amazon sites in Paperback and Kindle, Sony Kobo, Google books, Iphone Ibook etc.  He may be contacted on Twitter @KaRmasutraTKOS 


Tuesday, 27 December 2016

Beating down the Ego : Some Feasible, Tried and Tested Techniques

 Disclaimer: This blog begins with a disclaimer, unlike many that place a disclaimer at the end. Although various methods to temper the ego are discussed, these are practices shared by remarkable individuals I have been privileged to know personally. I, the author, do not claim to be among these esteemed practitioners but merely compile their techniques. Please do not assume I am an accomplished practitioner myself.

Some degree of ego or sense of self is essential for our earthly connections. Human emotions, including love and attachment to family, friends, and nation, hold significant value. Without any ego, a person might feel disconnected from the world, which may not be ideal at certain stages of life.

However, excessive ego often leads to suffering, both for the individual and others. For instance, autocratic leaders with inflated egos, such as former Philippine leader Rodrigo Duterte, have assumed roles of investigator, judge, and executioner, bypassing fair trials to eliminate drug users and dealers. Similarly, during the Iran-Iraq war, Saddam Hussein invited candid advice from his ministers. When Dr. Riyadh Ibrahim suggested he temporarily step down to facilitate peace talks, he was sacked, arrested and brutally executed. Such extreme actions highlight the cruelty that an oversized ego can inflict.

Countless examples exist of individuals causing pain due to their bloated egos. Shakespeare captures this in Measure for Measure:

“But man, proud man,
Dress'd in a little brief authority,
Most ignorant of what he's most assur'd—
His glassy essence—like an angry ape
Plays such fantastic tricks before high heaven
As makes the angels weep; who, with our spleens,
Would all themselves laugh mortal.”

― William Shakespeare, Measure for Measure

An ancient Sanskrit verse from the Hitopdesha states, ‘vidya dadati vinayam…..’ (knowledge gives humility), suggesting that true wisdom fosters a humble 'trimmed down' ego.

This blog does not aim to prove the harm of an inflated ego—history and daily life provide ample evidence. Instead, it explores methods used by wise individuals to reduce their ego, which is vital for personal harmony and spiritual growth. For example, I knew someone who, despite success and charity, struggled with meditation due to an oversized ego. After his guru advised ego reduction, he adopted practical techniques that led to renewed spiritual progress. An initial defensive reaction to such advice often signals an ego in need of trimming. As noted in my blog An Introspection Framework (http://karmasutratkos.blogspot.co.uk/2016/11/an-introspection-framework.html), ego can manifest as anger or jealousy.

For spiritual growth, a reduced ego is akin to slowing a car to navigate a sharp bend safely. A mind weighed down by pride in self, culture or achievements often lacks the clarity needed for spiritual insights. My book Karmasutra refers to this as the “cosmic sensitivity barrier,” which must be thin for true advancement. However, acquiring psychic powers through techniques like tantra or mantra does not require a reduced ego, though such powers alone do not equate to spiritual growth.

Dwelling on why a reduced ego is sometimes necessary for certain spiritual practices to bear fruit, let me use the analogy of driving a car. When driving on a straight road, we can travel at higher speeds, but when negotiating a bend, the speed must be reduced or we will be unable to safely make the turn. Similarly, when we are engaged in a quest for spiritual growth and wisdom, a bloated ego makes it difficult for the mind to navigate the introspective path required to assimilate deeper insights. Minds burdened with excessive pride in their own self, culture, nation, family, race or achievements often lose the mental perceptual sharpness and objectivity essential for spiritual advancement. (In my book Karmasutra, I explore this ‘perceptual sharpness’ in more detail and refer to it as the ‘cosmic sensitivity barrier’, which needs to remain thin.)

Having said this, if we are seeking only to acquire certain siddhis or special psychic powers, then this condition does not apply. That is because attaining such powers requires only the ability to use certain aids, whether tantra, mantra, yantra or techniques to communicate with unseen cosmic entities or energies. As a result, even highly egoistic individuals may obtain psychic powers. However, it must be remembered that true spiritual growth is not merely about acquiring such abilities.

Now, having discussed the value of reducing the ego, let me come to the main focus of this blog: practical ego-burning techniques. I should add that this is by no means a complete list. If readers wish to contribute their own ego-reduction methods, I would gladly welcome their additions.

Seeking Help – In many Western societies, we are encouraged to be independent. However, those who consciously strive to remain humble are willing to ask for help. Egoistic individuals often want to do everything themselves not because they enjoy the extra effort, but because they cannot bear the humility involved in seeking assistance. For instance, even when lost in the middle of a crowded city, unable to make sense of a map, some of us resist asking for directions simply because it involves humbly seeking help from another human being. If asking for even the smallest favour makes us uncomfortable, it is likely a sign of an inflated ego.

It is no coincidence that certain monastic orders in the East require monks to eat food obtained through begging. If they receive more than needed on a given day, they are forbidden from storing it. This daily practice of asking for food—often facing ridicule—serves to keep them humble. Of course, I am not suggesting that everyone adopt such a stringent lifestyle. However, we can apply this ego-burning principle in small ways. We might ask friends or acquaintances for advice, even when we are capable of resolving an issue ourselves, or ask for directions or other minor assistance.

For men who take pride in their looks or charm, a humorous yet effective technique is to ask a beautiful woman for sensual companionship. If she rejects the request, it becomes a valuable ego-deflating experience (for which he should thank her). And if she accepts, it becomes a mutually enjoyable celebration.

• Indulging Critics – We tend to be drawn to those who praise us and to avoid those who challenge our views. In more refined environments, such as corporate settings, this tendency becomes more subtle. Managers often appreciate team members who publicly support their plans and speak enthusiastically about their leadership. Conversely, those who raise concerns or highlight flaws are often side-lined. In private, we may label them ‘troublemakers’.

We prefer to surround ourselves with people who laugh loudly at our jokes. One way to identify flatterers is to observe who laughs the loudest at a joke that is barely funny.

Despite this tendency, it is still possible to seek out and meet our critics in person. Sharing a meal with them and listening openly to their feedback is a powerful way to reduce the ego. Inviting people with opposing political or ideological views, especially those we find hard to agree with, can also help in this regard.

Another ego-reduction practice is to remain connected with people who openly and repeatedly disagree with our social media posts, especially on political or social matters. One of my spiritually realised friends once advised me to do this. I attempted it and found it incredibly challenging to resist the urge to unfriend those who harshly criticised my Facebook posts, particularly those who were not close acquaintances. On Twitter, despite my efforts, I unfortunately gave in to the temptation and blocked those who frequently insulted me.

• Discouraging Flatterers – Some years ago, I watched a television interview with a political leader who was asked why she allowed her followers to prostrate and fall at her feet. She claimed she had asked them not to do so, but they simply refused to listen. (In fact, a recent amusing image showed a sports minister from an African country giving an exaggeratedly deferential handshake to his president. This picture was the butt of many twitter jokes.)  



There is likely a good reason why followers ignore us when we ask them not to flatter us. If they see that flatterers consistently gain some form of advantage, they will never take our words at face value. One way to reduce flattery is to find simple methods to penalise or distance ourselves from those who flatter us. For instance, if someone at the office constantly flatters us (or in the Indian context, touches our feet), we might reduce their access to us. Once flatterers begin to sense that flattery brings consequences, the speed at which the culture of flattery disappears will surprise us.

I once attended a meeting in Goa, India, with the revered spiritual teacher Dada Vaswani. He had devised a unique response to people touching his feet—he would make a point of touching their feet in return. Once people observed this, they stopped touching his feet, as few wanted to burden an elderly spiritual figure.

As a corollary, another way to reduce our ego is by touching someone else's feet. This is not easy if we do not come from a tradition where seeking the blessings of elders is customary. Jesus practised this when he washed the feet of his disciples. Lord Rama and Krishna always bowed to learned rishis. In Western or Middle Eastern contexts, kissing the hand or touching it to the forehead might serve a similar purpose. All such gestures reduce our own ego when performed sincerely.

• Criticising our own religion, family, or tradition – I am not suggesting we adopt a habit of constant negativity toward our own culture or religion. We are born into a certain tradition for a reason. Our overself (I won’t elaborate on that concept here—please refer to my book Karmasutra, or read the following passage for some context) may have chosen this birth setting as most suitable for our growth. So, it is natural to feel pride and affection for our background.

However, a powerful way to reduce ego is to listen to critics and agree with them when their arguments are reasonable, rather than responding defensively with, “What about the faults in your own tradition?” If I am Catholic and someone reasonably criticises the Catholic Church, I should acknowledge their point and perhaps add further insight. Even if the criticism seems unfair, maintaining silence and resisting the urge to retaliate is beneficial. Similarly, if I am of Indian origin and hear someone criticising India, and their points are valid, I should join them. Doing so helps reduce the ego and strengthens rapport with the other person.

Naturally, this can be uncomfortable. But just as physical pain at the gym signals that fat is being burned, psychological discomfort in such moments is proof that the ego is being burned away. That discomfort is a sign the method is working.

• Attempting and looking foolish – When others frequently praise our intellect, this technique is a strong ego-buster. A highly capable official I once knew practised this regularly. He had a sharp mind and strong spiritual awareness, but during formal meetings, he would sometimes say something slightly off-topic or naive. Others would quickly point out the flaws, and those less fond of him might even mock him. He would let this happen without correcting them and pretend to be a fool. This kept his ego in check. (He shared this with me on the condition that I would not disclose his identity.)

A variation of this technique is to occasionally seek the company of people far more intelligent or skilled than ourselves. If we struggle with economics, for instance, we can deliberately engage with experts in the field. In their presence, we will almost certainly feel inadequate.

Conversely, those with inflated egos often choose company where they feel superior. Attractive women, for instance, may seek out less attractive friends to ensure they stand out more and gain attention.

If we are proud of our wealth, a good ego check is to spend time with boastful, wealthy individuals. One spiritually mature friend of mine would visit his showy, wealthy classmate once a year. Each time, the classmate would flaunt his latest gadgets, cars, and possessions. By the end of the visit, my friend would feel utterly poor. The technique worked.

Another variation is to play games or sports with friends who are far more skilled. Our motivation to play usually depends on the chance of winning, at least occasionally. We prefer tennis opponents we can beat sometimes. But if we never win, we tend to avoid playing. Chess, in particular, is an excellent ego-buster because it relies entirely on intellect, not luck. Constant losses in chess can be humbling.

• Waiting – This is another effective technique. Egoistic people dislike waiting. They prefer to arrive just in time for a train or event, avoiding the appearance of waiting. If we are generally punctual, arriving early and waiting without complaint helps reduce the ego. Waiting for habitually late people, without showing anger, is also powerful.

• Apologising in public – We all enjoy being praised in public and prefer to apologise in private. Publicly apologising, especially in front of those who dislike us, is a superb ego-burner. Even the form of apology matters. A simple public ‘sorry’ is helpful, but more intensive versions exist.

One spiritually conscious academic I know practises this well. If he ever arrived late to an event—rare for someone of his rank—he would first apologise and then scold himself harshly in front of everyone, but not facetiously. He might say something like, “I was foolish to rely on my diary when I often forget to check it.” He used the strongest language for himself. Interestingly, if someone else made the same mistake, he would rarely scold them, and certainly never as harshly.

• Dealing with embarrassment – For most adults, especially women in skirts, falling while walking is embarrassing. In 2015, Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe fell while disembarking from a podium at an airport. His security staff immediately forced journalists to delete all photographs of the incident. (I have given below, one such picture published in the online edition of Independent newspaper).


                                                    (Source : Independent newspaper online, AP)

Egoistic people do not like embarrassments and often punish those who even witness such signs of their weakness. For men, being caught in a restaurant without money to pay the bill is a major embarrassment. Similarly, being caught with an open fly, or burping or passing gas in public, can be deeply embarrassing. Of course, deliberately creating an embarrassing situation might not be practical for commoners like us, but how a person responds afterwards is a useful indicator of ego. If an unforeseen embarrassment leads to intense anger towards someone—a subordinate, colleague or servant, or even oneself—it is a clear sign of a bloated ego. The ability to laugh at oneself in such moments is a sign of a well-trimmed ego.

  • Treating those far less powerful than us, better – Indian mythology recounts that when an angry sage once kicked the all-powerful Lord Vishnu in the chest, Lord Vishnu humbly enquired whether the sage’s leg had been hurt. Lord Krishna, an avatar of Vishnu, is also said to have shared with delight the beaten rice meal of his penniless, elderly classmate Sudama.

I once knew a professor who was the Head of Department (HOD) in a university, leading a team of several junior teachers. In most cases, if a junior colleague neglected a task, he would quietly do it himself. If someone refused to teach a course, he would cheerfully accept it. Some colleagues would even remark, ‘What is our HOD doing? He’s letting so-and-so take advantage of him.’ A few tried to convince him to be more strict and demanding, but he would have none of it. I never once saw him use power or coercion to compel others. He always made requests in the most humble and respectful language, as though he were the subordinate.

There are three broad ways in which people treat those far less powerful than themselves. Those with bloated egos often behave with disdain, arrogance, or complete indifference. People with moderate egos are generally kind and humane, but react forcefully when the less powerful act unreasonably. Only the truly humble—those with significantly reduced egos—respond with patience even when the subordinate is arrogant or difficult. How we treat someone far below us in power, especially when we have every reason to respond with authority, is a telling indicator of our ego.

(However, a caveat: avoiding conflict and power simply out of extreme timidity may not be a sign of humility. Shyness and a reduced ego often go together, but if conflict avoidance arises from a deep-seated inferiority complex, it becomes a case of making a virtue out of necessity.)

  • Trust and forgiveness – Some of my spiritual heroes used these as powerful ego-busting tools. It is said that Lord Rama, the mighty warrior avatar of Vishnu, forgave Ravana after defeating him in battle and even approached him with humility. Imagine confronting someone who has kidnapped your beloved wife and held her captive for years. If we were to defeat such a person and rescue our loved one, would we ever want to see their face again? But not Lord Rama. He asked his devoted younger brother Lakshmana to approach Ravana as a disciple and learn from his expertise in statecraft. Similarly, as Jesus lay dying on the cross, one of his final utterances was a prayer of forgiveness for those who harmed him.

Trust is another profound tool for reducing ego. One reason children do not have large egos is that they trust easily and forgive readily. They do not burden their memories with lists of past grievances or use these to justify mistrust or bitterness.

Letting go of past hurts and choosing to trust again is a powerful way to shrink the ego. One of my spiritually wise friends often lends money to those who have previously failed to repay him. Some may call him naïve, but he consciously uses this experience of ‘being cheated’ as a spiritual exercise in humility.

Most religions incorporate ego-reducing practices through rituals or customs. For instance, in the Catholic Church, the sacrament of confession requires a person to kneel and confess their sins to a priest. Even Catholic priests are expected to confess to another priest. It can be a deeply humbling experience to reveal our innermost secrets to someone with whom we share little personal intimacy. Among Hindus, there is the ritual of offering one’s hair to the gods. A full head of hair is often associated with good looks and ego, and to sacrifice it is an act of humility. Prostrating before gods in temples, touching the feet of gurus or elders, and performing suryanamaskar are all practices in Indian culture aimed at reducing the ego. In Islam, the act of namaaz, with one’s forehead touching the ground in prayer, also serves to humble the self.

This blog has already grown unusually long, and perhaps a bit unwieldy. My apologies for that—though I may be clumsily trying to practise an ego-busting technique here. As mentioned before, this is not an exhaustive list, merely a collection of techniques used by some of my spiritually advanced friends and acquaintances. I thank them for kindly sharing these insights with me. I invite readers to add their own tried and tested ego-busting techniques.

Wishing all my readers a joyful Kristu Jayanti (Christmas) season and a very Happy New Year 2017.


©Staju Jacob, 2016.


Staju Jacob is the author of the path-breaking book Karmasutra The Karma of Sex, which deals with the karmic spirituality of consensual sexual actions. This book is available globally on various Amazon sites in Paperback and Kindle, Sony Kobo, Google books, Iphone Ibook etc.  He may be contacted on Twitter @KaRmasutraTKOS 









Friday, 18 November 2016

An Introspection Framework

In the Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 4, Verse 21, Lord Krishna says that those who are free from attachment to action, who act only to maintain the body, and who relinquish all sense of ownership, never incur sin. While this level of perfection may be difficult to attain, we can always strive to reduce the barriers between ourselves and the universe.

In Karmasutra, this idea is introduced in Chapter 1 as the Cosmic Sensitivity Barrier (CSB). The concept explores how a thick CSB interferes with our ability to interact with the universe—or with God, Allah, Ishwar, or one’s personal divine presence, depending on one's chosen terminology.

Over time, our CSB tends to thicken due to the guile we practise in daily life. We laugh at our boss’s jokes, even when they are not funny. We promise to stay in touch with people despite having no such intention. We pretend to agree with our superiors and flatter them in the hope of being seen as close to them. These discrepancies between our true thoughts and our spoken words or actions accumulate and reinforce the thickness of our CSB. Eventually, we feel unheard by the universe and disconnected from its messages.

Some people are fortunate to be born with less guile. When they are angry, they show it. When they dislike someone, they cannot pretend otherwise. Even while living in the world, they seem immune to its lessons in diplomacy. Of such people, Jesus said in Matthew 5:5, “Blessed are the meek.” I have met many such individuals and count myself lucky to have some of them as friends.

However, those of us who consider ourselves smart, diplomatic, cunning or highly skilled in navigating the world may still yearn for spiritual growth and a deeper connection with the universe (or divine). This post and the introspection framework below are primarily intended for such individuals. We may not be able to immediately remove the thickness of the CSB, but we can begin by reducing the impact of certain stress-generating emotions such as bloated ego, anger and fear. Many intelligent and rational people are fortunate to have the capacity for introspection.

That said, the rational mind is also subtle and deceptive. When someone attempts to reduce their bloated ego, the mind reassures them that humility has been achieved. Yet, that same ego may be covertly redirected into anger or envy. A person who never boasts about themselves might have a fierce temper or may be unable to praise others. This is a clear sign that the ego has not vanished but simply taken a different form.

Those capable of honest introspection may find the Introspection Hexagon (see figure below) useful in observing how these six negative emotional manifestations are balanced within. The wheel at the centre of the figure symbolises balance. It is rare to eliminate these emotions entirely, as they stem from our human condition. However, remembering the Introspection Hexagon can help us identify which emotions may be becoming dominant and disrupting our spiritual equilibrium.



Let us consider some common patterns and see whether we fit any of them:
  • Bloated Ego rechannelled into Anger: A person who considers themselves extremely humble may frequently lose their temper with family, friends or colleagues. This indicates that the ego is still present. Long-held anger can also transform into hate.

  • Bloated Ego rechannelled into Jealousy: Some people, while thinking of themselves as humble, regularly belittle others’ achievements or cannot tolerate praise directed at someone else. This, too, points to a hidden ego.

  • Bloated Ego rechannelled into Shame, Guilt or Fear: These emotions often mask the same inner imbalance.

The hexagon can also serve as a tool for exploring other negative emotions. For example, fear can easily shift into hate or anger. So if we believe we feel no fear, we should examine any hatred or anger we might be experiencing. Jealousy, similarly, may change into greed. Greed may take the form of lust (for sex), power (which can become megalomania), food or drink (gluttony), or wealth. Jealousy may also transform into anger or hatred towards the person we envy.

Fear and insecurity also mutate easily. A person who feels fear at work, and fails to support a friend out of concern for displeasing a superior, may later feel guilt or shame. Likewise, shame and guilt can generate fear: “What if someone finds out?” Fear can even morph into greed—fear of poverty may lead to an obsession with money. A sense of inadequacy in one area can lead to excessive sexual behaviour to reaffirm self-worth. {In my book Karmasutra, and in other blogs I have never condemned sex with single or different partners, but I believe that just like gluttony is bad despite eating being healthy, lust is detrimental while normal sexuality (without undue guilt baggage and with mutual enjoyment and consent) is healthy.}

The key point is this: when we work to control one negative emotion, we must carefully observe the others to see whether they are being thrown out of balance. Controlling one emotion excessively may cause another to rise unchecked. The Introspection Hexagon is designed to help those with both the intellect and the desire for honest self-examination.

This kind of calm, regular introspection can gradually reduce our CSB thickness and assist us in our spiritual journey. As always, your thoughts, additions to this model and criticisms are warmly welcomed.

©Staju Jacob, 2016.


Staju Jacob is the author of the path-breaking book Karmasutra The Karma of Sex, which deals with the karmic spirituality of consensual sexual actions. This book is available globally on various Amazon sites in Paperback and Kindle, Sony Kobo, Google books, Iphone Ibook etc.  He may be contacted on Twitter @KaRmasutraTKOS 





Wednesday, 9 November 2016

Trump: The Harbinger of the Age of Mahabali


On this historic day, with Donald Trump elected President of the USA, it is time for all who are interested in spiritual affairs to reflect on the shape of the world to come.

Those who truly understand the spiritual workings of the universe know that most events in the material world are reflections of decisions already made in the spiritual realm. As I mentioned in my earlier blog here, before these events unfold in our world, they have already occurred in the astral plane.

Those observing the spiritual world closely will recognise that Trump’s rise to power is the continuation of a process that began some years ago in the spiritual realm responsible for overseeing Earth. This process involves the emergence of strong, Mahabali-type leaders in various parts of the world, leaders who will boldly guide humanity to its next stage of evolution. In the pyramidal figure provided in the blog, I have identified the other Mahabali rulers, in my humble view.

For those less familiar with the Mahabali myth, the commonly held belief is that he was a wise, just, and powerful ancient ruler of Kerala in South India. Though known for being tough and aggressive, this asuric Mahabali was also an excellent administrator, under whose reign the people of Kerala enjoyed peace, prosperity and a tension-free life. His popularity and strength so alarmed the gods that they sought the help of Lord Vishnu to remove him. Onam is still celebrated in Kerala as the day Mahabali visits his people each year.

As is often the case with Indian mythology, there are several versions of this legend, but I refer here only to the most commonly accepted one. (Another great administrator from the asuric tradition is Ravana. Though reviled by many in India, he was a spiritually accomplished meditator and an expert in statecraft and governance.)

Like Trump, many Mahabali-type leaders are unconventional in their language, demeanour and temperament. They speak boldly on topics other politicians tend to avoid. Like Trump, these leaders disregard political correctness and often cause controversy. When in power, they take tough, unconventional decisions. They typically have a patriarchal mindset and exhibit a strong, macho presence.

Such leaders are often harsh on dissent but generally intend to work for the benefit of their people. They dislike opposition and tend to punish those who cross them. Their governance style is centralised, with a high concentration of power in their hands. Yet, like Mahabali, they are usually wise administrators and just rulers.

With Trump’s election, an important node in the pyramid marking the Mahabali era has been completed. Other significant nodes, shown in the figure below, include Xi Jinping in China, Putin in Russia, Netanyahu in Israel and Narendra Modi in India.

What does the formation of this pyramid suggest about the world’s future?

In my humble opinion, it indicates the following:

  • The rise of Mahabali-type leaders in many other countries, from the Philippines to Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Mexico, bringing with them a focus on progress and governance.

  • The emergence of strong, decisive leadership worldwide, unafraid to take bold military action. This will result in a general alignment of opposing forces on the global stage.

  • A transitional period during which freedom of speech and fundamental rights will give way to a greater focus on security, material progress, stability and governance. It will be a difficult time for liberal journalists and dissenters.

The spiritual good news is that this pyramid is intended only for a relatively short duration, having been sanctioned at the highest spiritual levels for specific purposes.

Eventually, the world will witness a struggle between these strong, governance-focused leaders and the forces of fundamentalism and outdated thinking. This is one of the main reasons the pyramid of strong leadership is being constructed — to enable collaboration among similar leaders and, ultimately, to cleanse the world of radical and regressive elements.

Everything has a pre-destined expiry date. When the time comes — which, in my humble assessment, will be around 2030 — this Mahabali leadership era will dissolve as swiftly as it arose. Once the intended purpose is fulfilled, these leaders will be replaced by more saatvic personalities, embodying peace and divine qualities. In the case of Mahabali, this transition was carried out by the Vaamana avatar of Lord Vishnu. Likewise, more saatvic leaders will succeed today’s Mahabali figures in due course.

In the meantime, the period of coagulation, conflict and conquest has begun. It marks humanity’s next evolutionary stage. The election of Donald Trump is the harbinger of this Mahabali era.


©Staju Jacob, 2016.


Staju Jacob is the author of the path-breaking book Karmasutra The Karma of Sex, which deals with the karmic spirituality of consensual sexual actions. This book is available globally on various Amazon sites in Paperback and Kindle, Sony Kobo, Google books, Iphone Ibook etc.  He may be contacted on Twitter @KaRmasutraTKOS